Beyond regulating trade: Understanding the consumers driving saiga horn demand

The saiga is a Star-Wars looking Critically Endangered antelope from Central Asia, whose horn is used in traditional Chinese medicines (TCM). Last month, a new rulling by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora strengthened trade regulations around saiga product exports[1].However, conservationists have argued (for numerous unsustainably used wildlife products, such as elephant ivory and rhino horn) that demand reduction and not just trade regulation, is vital to long-term, effective solutions[2],[3]. And unfortunately, this consumer-focused attention is still limited for many lesser known species, like the saiga, that are being impacted by poaching.

saiga c igor shpilenok

Saiga horn is mainly used to treat fever and heatiness (a TCM state of illness with symptoms like nasal congestion and sore throat). Poaching of saigas in the 1990s took out more than 95% of the population[4], and poaching still persists today, despite many policy and on-the-ground efforts from range states and international bodies[5]. In addition to this hunting pressure, saigas have also been heavily impacted in recent years by mass bacterial and viral disease outbreaks[6].

To address the dire attention gap around saiga horn consumers, our work, published today in PLOS One, represents the most extensive research to date on a saiga consumer population. We conducted over 2200 consumer surveys in Singapore with members of the general Chinese Singaporean population. Singapore is recognised as a top saiga consumer country[7], and within the country, legal-with-permit saiga horn products are marketed most commonly as ling yang (羚羊), antelope’s horn, or "Cornu Saiga tataricae". 

picture1

Through our work we found that 19% of respondents were high-level saiga horn users. This means that they consider saiga horn to be a product they use most oftento treat heatiness or fever in themselves and others. Additionally, 47% of individuals who buy saiga horn for themselves were also buying it for someone else.We saw that saiga horn users were most likely to be middle-aged Buddhist or Taoists, however, horn use was seen across almost all demographic groups.

Consumer research like this one is a first and neccesary step in demand reduction efforts. By thoroughly understanding a user group you can more accurately design behavioural interventions targeting unsustainable consumption, or really any undesirable behaviour. Such evidence-based interventions are being conducted every day in fields like public health and development, targeting behaviours that range from alcohohism[8], to poverty alleviation[9], and excessive meat consumption[10].

picture2

One key insight we found, for instance, is that TCM shopkeepers and an individual’s family are the most likely people to have recommended saiga horn to someone, thus these are the influencers that can be utilised in a behavioural intervention. Shopkeepers, for example, fill a similar role as a western pharmacist, and pharmacist-dessiminated health interventions[11]are a common tool that a shopkeeper-disseminated intervention could be based on.

We also found that saiga horn users had a greater overall propensity for perceiving animals that are used in TCM as being common in the wild (regardless of the animals’ actual conservation status), and that this difference was especially significant for saiga. Identifying an awareness gap like this one gives a clear possible angle for a future project message that strives to drive up conservation concern in a socially relevant way.

Lastly, given that there are many common alternatives to saiga within TCM, such as barley, honeysuckle, and goat’s horn, and that these options are readily available and afordable in Singapore, encouraging consumers to use more sustainable products is a viable option for demand reduction efforts.

Saiga horn use in Singapore is extensive, and non-negligible. And if attention remains solely on the supply-side of an unsustainable or illegal wildlife trade, then the root of the problem - consumer demand - will continue to drive poaching until there are no individuals left to poach.

 


[2]Challender D, MacMillan D. Poaching is more than an Enforcement Problem. Conservation Letters. 2014. 7: 484–494.

[3]Zhang et al. Wildlife trade, consumption and conservation awareness in southwest China. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2008. 17(6).

[4]Milner-Gulland et al. Dramatic declines in saiga antelope populations. Oryx. 2001. 35(4) 

[5]Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Conservation, Restoration and Sustainable Use of the Saiga Antelope. Bonn. 2005. Available from https://www.cms.int/en/species/saiga-tatarica.

[6]Kock et al. Saigas on the brink: Multidisciplinary analysis of the factors influencing mass mortality events. Science Advances. 2018. 4(1).

[7]CITES Seventieth meeting of the Standing Committee. Saiga antelope (Saiga spp.): Report of the Secretariat. Rosa Khutor, Sochi (Russian Federation), 1-5 October 2018. Available from https://cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/com/sc/70/E-SC70-58.pdf.

[8]Kelly et al.. How do people recover from alcohol dependence? A systematic review of the research on mechanisms of behavior change in Alcoholics Anonymous. Addiction Research and Theory. 2009. 17(3):236-259.

[9]Bryan et al. Overcoming Behavioral Obstacles to Escaping Poverty. Behavioral Science and Policy. 2017. 3(1): 81–92.

[10]Behavior Change For Nature: A Behavioral Science Toolkit for Practitioners. A Behavioural Insights Team Report. O4 April, 2019. https://www.bi.team/publications/behavior-change-for-nature-a-behavioral....

[11]Brown et al. Community pharmacy-delivered interventions for public health priorities: a systematic review of interventions for alcohol reduction, smoking cessation and weight management, including meta-analysis for smoking cessation. BMJ Open. 2016. 6(2).

List of site pages